Did Hillary Clinton advocate a 'do no harm' approach to cryptocurrency regulation?
As a keen observer of the intersection of politics and finance, I must inquire: Did Hillary Clinton, during her political tenure, advocate for a 'do no harm' approach towards the regulation of cryptocurrency? This question arises given the rapid evolution of digital assets and their potential impact on the global financial landscape. Given her extensive background in public policy and her perceived stance on economic issues, it's imperative to understand if she favors a cautious, non-intrusive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, or if she favors a more rigorous oversight mechanism. Clarifying her stance on this matter could provide valuable insights for policymakers and market participants alike.